Clinical Research AI Inside the Hospital Boundary
A research hospital wanted AI-assisted clinical document analysis while keeping PHI inside its own boundary. Hosted AI services could not guarantee the required data residency or audit posture.
- Zero
- PHI Egress
- Role + study
- Access Model
- 100%
- Audit Coverage
The operational problem
Research teams want retrieval over clinical text, but the governing constraint is that protected health information cannot leave the institution and every access must be attributable. That pushes the entire pipeline — embedding, retrieval, inference, and logging — inside the hospital boundary.
What Enfuse built
- On-prem inference and embedding services sized to the research workload
- PHI detection and redaction at ingest, with reversible tokens for authorized roles
- Study- and role-scoped retrieval with consent-status filtering
- End-to-end audit logging of prompts, retrieved documents, and outputs
- Evaluation harness for clinical extraction accuracy before each model change
Architecture
- Ingest — de-identification and indexing of clinical documents
- Retrieve — access-scoped RAG over the research corpus
- Reason — on-prem model inference with policy enforcement
- Record — immutable audit trail for compliance review
Hardware and software
- On-prem GPU servers
- Sovereign Runtime with DocuFlow retrieval service
- Hospital identity provider, SIEM, and existing EHR interfaces
Deployment environment
On-premises hospital datacenter. No external model API calls.
Results
- Retrieval-assisted review of clinical documents without data egress
- Attributable, auditable access for every request
Reference architecture. Describes the deployment pattern rather than measured outcomes at a named institution.
Discuss this pattern against your environment
Bring your constraints — sensors, security boundary, latency budget — and we will tell you what is realistic.